Parameter sensitivity in photosynthetic temperature response functions in terrestrial biosphere models: Evaluating the effects of fixed vs. estimated deactivation energies

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Gunasekera, T.S.S.
dc.contributor.author Geekiyanage, N.
dc.contributor.author Kumarathunge, D.P.
dc.date.accessioned 2025-10-09T05:19:38Z
dc.date.available 2025-10-09T05:19:38Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.identifier.citation Gunasekera, T.S.S., Geekiyanage, N., & Kumarathunge, D.P.(2025). Parameter sensitivity in photosynthetic temperature response functions in terrestrial biosphere models: Evaluating the effects of fixed vs. estimated deactivation energies. . International Symposium on Agriculture and Environment, 22. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1800-4830
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.lib.ruh.ac.lk/handle/iruor/20209
dc.description.abstract Photosynthesis is a central process in the terrestrial carbon cycle and a key determinant of predicting plant responses to climate change. Terrestrial biosphere models (TBMs) commonly simulate the temperature response of C₃ photosynthesis using the peaked Arrhenius function, which relies on parameters including Vcmax (maximum rate of Rubisco activity), Jmax (potential electron transport rate), K25 (process rate at 25 °C), Ea (activation energy), ΔS (entropy), and Hd (deactivation energy). To minimize overfitting, many models assume a fixed Hd value, though the consequences of this assumption remain underexplored. We analysed a global dataset of plant photosynthetic temperature responses to evaluate differences in parameter estimates and photosynthesis predictions between models with fixed and estimated Hd. Maximum rate of Rubisco activity at 25°C (K25) and Ea were generally higher with fixed Hd models, with ΔS showing higher or similar values and strong correlations. Potential electron transport rate at 25°C (K25) and Ea were also higher with fixed Hd, though Ea varied more, while ΔS showed higher values with weaker alignment, indicating greater inconsistency, suggesting Jmax is less sensitive to model structure compared to Vcmax, which exhibits consistent trends across parameters with fixed Hd assumptions. Percentage decline in modelled photosynthesis between fixed and estimated Hd assumptions was evaluated at optimum temperature (Topt) and ±5 °C from the optimum. Models with fixed Hd consistently estimated higher Topt values and lower declines, suggesting that fixed Hd models may overestimate thermal tolerance. These results highlight that while fixed Hd assumptions may be acceptable for estimating K25, they risk misrepresenting temperature responses of Ea, ΔS, and photosynthetic performance under warming. Incorporating variable Hd improves model flexibility and enhances the realism of TBM projections under climate change. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Faculty of Agriculture-University of Ruhuna en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries ISAE;2025
dc.subject Deactivation energy en_US
dc.subject Jmax en_US
dc.subject Peaked arrhenius en_US
dc.subject Temperature response en_US
dc.subject Vcmax en_US
dc.title Parameter sensitivity in photosynthetic temperature response functions in terrestrial biosphere models: Evaluating the effects of fixed vs. estimated deactivation energies en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account